4 thoughts on “Bear children enter the pet shop and let the guests 20,000 yuan golden gradient cat. Is this just a boy's responsibility?”
Susan
I personally think that this matter is not the responsibility of the boy alone. The boy’s parents and the owner are actually responsible. This shop really should not put the key in the place where the boy can get enough, so The shop and boy of this pet shop should have half of the responsibility. Of course, this boy will be consciously doing this. He knows that the key can open the door of the pet cabinet, so he opened it. He had a conscious mistake. The boy must be responsible. The boy's parents could not take off the responsibility. This kind of thing can only be compensated by the guardian. However, I think that the boy's parents should not bear all the compensation, and it is enough to bear half of it. After all, the owner also has half of the responsibility. When the owner knows that the cat is so expensive, he also puts the key at hand. No, and the cat has been released, the value of the cat is difficult to be fixed. To be honest, it is quite difficult to do. Parents must take care of their children, know that their children are young, they may do something wrong, and they have to look at the child. When the child has made a mistake, it is too late to regret it. It is clear that whether it is a shop or a child, it is wrong. The store’s consciousness of valuables is also very weak. Normal people, such valuable keys will be put alone, but they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will. Really not. Actually, I think the boy may not know that this pet is valuable. He may just want to put the cat out and think that the cat is pity in the cage, but he doesn’t know. The boy’s starting point may be good, but he did do something wrong. The cat was released like this. It is really a pity that the pet cat is actually difficult to survive outside. Sad, I hope pet cats can go home by themselves. I really don't want this pet cat something.
I think this matter is indeed the responsibility of a boy. After entering the pet shop, the man put the guest's cat. The parents of the boy needed to be responsible.
Both boys and children's parents are responsible. Children play are natural, but parents cannot discipline their children and let their children do something wrong, that is, the parents' negligence.
I personally think that this matter is not the responsibility of the boy alone. The boy’s parents and the owner are actually responsible. This shop really should not put the key in the place where the boy can get enough, so The shop and boy of this pet shop should have half of the responsibility. Of course, this boy will be consciously doing this. He knows that the key can open the door of the pet cabinet, so he opened it. He had a conscious mistake. The boy must be responsible. The boy's parents could not take off the responsibility. This kind of thing can only be compensated by the guardian. However, I think that the boy's parents should not bear all the compensation, and it is enough to bear half of it. After all, the owner also has half of the responsibility. When the owner knows that the cat is so expensive, he also puts the key at hand. No, and the cat has been released, the value of the cat is difficult to be fixed. To be honest, it is quite difficult to do. Parents must take care of their children, know that their children are young, they may do something wrong, and they have to look at the child. When the child has made a mistake, it is too late to regret it. It is clear that whether it is a shop or a child, it is wrong. The store’s consciousness of valuables is also very weak. Normal people, such valuable keys will be put alone, but they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will, they are placed at will. Really not.
Actually, I think the boy may not know that this pet is valuable. He may just want to put the cat out and think that the cat is pity in the cage, but he doesn’t know. The boy’s starting point may be good, but he did do something wrong. The cat was released like this. It is really a pity that the pet cat is actually difficult to survive outside. Sad, I hope pet cats can go home by themselves. I really don't want this pet cat something.
I think this matter is indeed the responsibility of a boy. After entering the pet shop, the man put the guest's cat. The parents of the boy needed to be responsible.
It is indeed a boy's responsibility, because pet shops will definitely not often close the cats, after all, many people will come to see pets.
Both boys and children's parents are responsible. Children play are natural, but parents cannot discipline their children and let their children do something wrong, that is, the parents' negligence.